Tesla Robotaxis Self-Driving Technology Self-Driving Cars Driver Assistance Systems Robotaxi Full Self-Driving Artificial Intelligence Safety Electric Vehicles Regulations Safety Features Tesla Autopilot Driverless Technology Safety Systems Safety Regulations General Motors Partnerships Level 3 Autonomy Safety Standards Full Self-Driving (FSD) Waymo Safety Data Level 3 Autonomous Driving Self-Driving Systems Industry Challenges Full Self Driving In-Vehicle Experiences Vehicle Features Software Vehicle Connectivity Driving Assistance Systems Driver-Assistance Systems Robotaxi Services Robo-taxis Qualcomm Snapdragon Tesla Cybercab Mobility Services Research and Development Crash Reporting Automated Driving Level 5 Autonomy Nvidia Drive Nvidia Automotive Technologies Development Platforms Vehicle Safety Nvidia Policy Issues AI in Automotive Speed Records Ride-Hailing Technology Fleet Management Safety Concerns Autopilot Sensor Technologies Self-Driving Trucks Driver Monitoring System Software Update Driver-Assisted Systems Mercedes-Benz CP6 Level 5 System Level 4 System Level 2+ System Level 2+ Level 5 Apple Autonomous Vehicle Radar Systems Tesla Next-Generation Platform Tesla Network Controversies Advanced Driver Assistance System Regulation Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Consumer Technology Volkswagen AI Development Companies Collaboration Technologies Development Market Tensor Robocar Ride-sharing Radar Technology Software-Defined Vehicles Self-Driving Taxis Uber Delivery Systems Level 4 Autonomy Driver Assistance Technology Updates AI Applications
Tesla argues jurors were swayed by references to Elon Musk, signaling a looming test of how courts assign blame for driver‑assist crashes.