Politics ❯ Environmental Policy
International Agreements Activism Government Action Corporate Regulation Fossil Fuels Geoengineering Regulation Fossil Fuel Regulation International Cooperation Government Actions Marine Conservation Conservation Efforts Sustainable Development Global Warming Disaster Preparedness Geoengineering Debate Energy Policy Public Health Policy Legislation Emission Targets Government Initiatives Disaster Response Disaster Management Legal Frameworks Urban Development Emission Reduction Strategies Carbon Emissions International Negotiations Wildfire Management Activist Groups Emission Reduction Targets Climate Neutrality Goals Climate Action International Treaties Business Influence Public Response Fossil Fuels Regulation Fossil Fuel Policy Public Discourse Fisheries Policy Emissions Reduction Biodiversity Conservation Sports and Politics Global Environmental Issues Debate on CCS Mobility Policy Community Involvement Emission Reductions Activism Legislation Emission Reduction Commitments European Union International Law Debate on Climate Change Public Perception Research Funding Public Protests UN Initiatives Protest Movements California Climate Policy Geoengineering Policy Sustainability Strategies Scientific Research Funding EU Regulations Economic Inequality Global Agreements Health Policy Activist Movements Political Will Forest Legislation Sustainability Oil and Gas Regulation Emission Reduction Trump Administration Marine Protection Agricultural Policy Plastic Regulation Public Health Regulations Water Management Policy Oil and Gas Production Global Climate Agreements Public Participation Regulatory Actions Corporate Accountability Fossil Fuel Emissions Regulation of Energy Companies Global Climate Initiatives Carbon Regulation Drought Management EPA Policy Government Response Emission Regulations EU Climate Targets Geo-engineering Controversies Marine Protection Laws
Judges found no breach of Article 8 in Norway’s handling of climate impacts tied to the 2016 licensing.