Stalking Threats Sexual Harassment Public Safety Verbal Abuse Intimidation Legal Proceedings Workplace Harassment Death Threats Swatting Assault Racially Aggravated Offenses Bullying Racially Aggravated Harassment Cyberbullying Discrimination Domestic Issues Emotional Abuse Blackmail Aggravated Harassment Abuse Legal Cases Public Order Offenses Restraining Orders Legal Issues Racial Harassment Doxxing Public Disturbance Extortion Public Transport Crime Tenant Harassment Verbal Harassment Alcohol Abuse Protection from Harassment Act 1997 Online Behavior Cybercrime Psychological Abuse Public Order Military Crime Student Safety Workplace Rights Complaints Mental Harassment Child Abuse Eve Teasing Doxing Disorderly Conduct Malicious Communications Election Workers Hate Crime Gas Station Incident Phone Calls Misdemeanor Charges Sextortion Neighbor Harassment Journalist Intimidation Intrusion Strikes shoves kicks Physical Surveillance Prohibited Use of Weapons Violence Domestic Harassment Protection from Abuse Order Racist Threats Telephone Harassment Telecommunications Harassment Moneylaundering Racially Motivated Crimes Defamation Criminal Behavior Aggressive Behavior Threatening Behavior Sexual Misconduct Sexual Assault Deportation Sexual Offenses Teenage Prankster Email Threats Aggravated Offenses Privacy Online Safety Violations Online Safety Cyber-flashing Allegations Online Offenses Sexual Abuse Legal Complaints Workplace Violence Cyber Harassment Legal Offenses Privacy Issues Personal Safety Security Threats Public Disorder Gang Behavior Privacy Violations Vandalism Suicide Public Behavior Public Spaces
The court ruled the allegations stemmed from a civil dispute, deemed the complaint vexatious, and allowed petitioners to pursue criminal contempt proceedings.