Education Law Judicial Review Government Accountability Federal Reserve Act Employment Law Immigration Law Government Authority Government Agencies Federal Reserve Consumer Protection Laws Government Officials SNAP Compliance Legal Challenges Workforce Management Employee Rights Food Assistance Programs Funding Regulations Monetary Policy Independent Agencies Transportation Law Central Banking Impoundment Control Act Agency Actions Grant Management Judicial Decisions Executive Orders Privacy Law Grant Conditions Government Oversight Financial Oversight Central Bank Governance Presidential Authority Government Appointments USDA Policies Education Regulations Employment Regulations Removal Procedures Agency Independence Tax-Exempt Status Acquisition Law Identification Laws Government Restructuring Labor Relations Funding Laws Public Service Labor Law Data Collection Grant Programs Removal Protections Education Policy Antideficiency Act Motor Carrier Safety Grant Regulations Disaster Management Funding Authority Data Compliance Rulemaking Process Diversity Policies Consumer Protection Tariffs Funding Conditions Executive Authority Due Process Compliance and Enforcement Food Assistance Compliance Federal Reserve Law Immigration Regulations Government Funding Emergency Funding Public Comment Procedures Higher Education Funding Immigration Policy Disaster Relief Funding Anti-Deficiency Act Grant Compliance Hatch Act Compliance Site Selection Process Government Contracts Public Participation Housing Grants Driver's Licenses Food Assistance Law USDA USDA Actions FDA Regulations Dodd-Frank Act Court Orders Food Assistance Legislation State Compliance Welfare Benefits Justice Department Funding Mechanisms Guidance Issuance Guidance Interpretation USDA Guidance Grant Administration Securities Law Research Funding Health Policy Removal Authority
The court found the NEVI rescission unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act, paving the way for FHWA to restore California’s allocation.
