Corporate Law Corporate Accountability Regulatory Compliance Federal Lawsuits Lawsuits Public Interest Litigation Administrative Law Corporate Liability Injunctions Corporate Responsibility Consumer Protection Regulatory Challenges Court Cases Settlements Nonprofit Organizations Federal Regulations Civil Rights Conservation Groups Construction Lawsuits Legal Challenges Government Accountability Public Interest Law Climate Litigation Permits Youth Rights Compensation Claims Class Action Federal Court Federal Court Cases Indigenous Rights Energy Regulation Court Decisions Regulatory Framework Regulatory Issues Coastal Restoration PFAS Contamination PFAS Contamination Lawsuits Citizen Actions Climate Lawsuits Youth Activism Plastic Pollution Pollution Cases Energy Regulations State vs Federal Powers Administrative Procedures Environmental Protection Government Actions Pipeline Regulations Federal Permits Rights Protection State vs Federal Public Interest Lawsuits Public Interest Class Action Lawsuits Supreme Court Southern Environmental Law Center Climate Lawfare Citizen Rights Offshore Oil Drilling Settlement Tribal Law Pollution Lawsuits EU Law Pesticide Regulation Local Government Lease Sale Regulations Immigration Law Climate Accountability Legal Precedents Migrant Detention Regulatory Approvals Human Rights Research Ethics Legal Actions Deutsche Umwelthilfe Legal Disputes Exploration Rights Nuclear Regulatory Commission Utility Regulation Youth Plaintiffs Citizen Enforcement Compliance Civil Lawsuits National Park Service Settlement Agreements Fossil Fuel Industry Public Nuisance Energy Policy Corporate Lawsuits Interstate Commerce Advocacy Regulatory Affairs Legal Agreements Preservationist Lawsuits State vs. Federal Government Government Lawsuits Climate Change Lawsuits Pesticide Regulations Insurance Claims Transportation Issues
The decision invokes federal preemption under the Pipeline Safety Act, prompting Michigan to consider an appeal.
