Federal Courts Supreme Court Appeals Court Administrative Law Injunctions Judicial Decisions Appeals High Court Election Law Constitutional Law Environmental Law Employment Law Legal Challenges Federal Court Education Law Antitrust Law Federal Appeals Court Consumer Rights High Court Decisions Immigration Law Intellectual Property Consumer Protection Trade Law Appeals Process Supreme Court Decisions Federal Law Legal Proceedings Alabama Supreme Court Antitrust Cases First Amendment Asylum Law Electoral Law Legal Cases Civil Rights Damages State Supreme Court Legal Procedures Transportation Law Defamation Political Trials FDA Approval Criminal Law Criminal Sentences Contract Law Public Safety Legal Precedents Planning Law Financial Regulations Local Government Legal Obligations Contempt of Court First Amendment Rights Tariffs Alabama Supreme Court Decision Case Law Migration Law Free Speech Compensation Restraining Orders Animal Rights Freedom of Speech Appellate Court Sports Law Eviction Judicial Authority Tax Law Political Cases Judge Juan Merchan Tariff Legislation Labor Law Religious Law International Law Embezzlement Housing Regulations Corporate Law Environmental Regulations Appellate Courts Public Protests Transgender Rights Legal Decisions Negligence Temporary Restraining Orders Federal District Court Federal Appeals Dismissals Indigenous Law Property Law Commercial Law Family Law International Trade Law Arbitration Criminal Cases Legal Implications Judge's Decision Abortion Laws Financial Obligations Political Law High Court Judgements Legal Disputes Freedom of Information
The decision applies the Safe Roads Amendment’s strict limits, rejecting the county’s attempt to treat public‑safety operations as transportation uses.
