Particle.news
Economic Impact Government Accountability Environmental Policy Economic Policy Health Policy Environmental Awareness Government Spending National Security Community Impact Immigration Policy Environmental Impact Environmental Issues Consumer Rights Transportation Government Efficiency Government Reform Environmental Advocacy Environmental Activism Government Actions Immigration Issues Energy Policy Social Issues Transportation Policy Environmental Justice Social Welfare Political Discourse Taxation Government Programs Education Policy Energy Consumption Climate Action Economic Inequality Energy Security Civic Engagement Legislation Civil Rights Consumer Protection Government Transparency Education Reform Crime Prevention Community Safety Government Initiatives Healthcare Access Technology Impact Infrastructure Development Welfare Programs Safety Regulations Government Oversight Social Security Political Influence Climate Policy Consumer Impact Environmental Concerns Drug Policy Disaster Management Immigration Community Engagement Environmental Regulations Social Services Government Agencies Political Accountability Impact on Citizens Social Impact Government Services Voting Rights Security Measures Political Parties Defense Spending Regulation Border Security Infrastructure Political Debate Reproductive Rights Health Regulations Healthcare Taxpayer Impact Healthcare Policy Defense Policy Government Response Climate Activism Climate Change Consumer Advocacy Transportation Issues Energy Access Government Funding Education Law Enforcement Education System Gun Ownership Consumer Behavior Bureaucracy Transparency Military Service Disaster Relief Crisis Management Taxpayer Rights Economic Impact on Society Diversity and Inclusion Education Funding Media Influence
The proposed budget slashes $163 billion from non-military discretionary programs while boosting defense spending to $1.01 trillion and increasing homeland security funding by 65 percent.
