Sustainable Development Climate Action Sustainability Water Conservation Climate Change Water Management Transportation Policy Energy Consumption Energy Policy Animal Rights Community Engagement Urban Planning Drought Management Sustainable Transportation Water Policy Energy Transition Climate Activism Wildlife Conservation Water Usage Regulations Pollution Control Waste Management Sustainable Practices Health Policy Climate Policy Air Quality Management Community Initiatives Air Quality Wildlife Protection Crisis Management Legislation Resource Management Conservation Efforts Air Quality Initiatives Water Restrictions Air Quality Regulations Political Discourse Water Resources Community Impact Political Impact Sustainability Initiatives Government Accountability Community Health Political Dynamics Aviation Regulations Corporate Responsibility Corporate Accountability Climate Change Mitigation Research Funding Health Regulations Water Rights Political Decisions National Parks Regulation Political Debate Green Initiatives Nuclear Energy Policy Waste Management Policies Carbon Emissions Regulatory Reform Forest Management Nuclear Phase-Out Climate Finance Wildfire Management Water Safety Business Impact Disaster Response Geoengineering Policy Citizen Impact Fisheries Policy Fossil Fuel Regulation Climate Justice Climate Resilience Climate Intervention Nuclear Energy Debate Conservation Clean Energy Initiatives Business Regulations Urban Development Clean Air Act Waste Reduction Air Quality Policy Recreation Policy Water Usage Restrictions Biodiversity Governance Resource Sustainability Suicide Prevention Fire Safety Decarbonization Legislative Actions Mining Regulations Community Reporting Agricultural Impact Wildlife Management Policy Climate Targets Government Initiatives Land Use Policy CO₂ Pricing Transparency Government Action Biodiversity Conservation
Republican attorneys general claimed the climate chapter would prejudice judges, leading the judiciary’s research arm to remove it.
