Particle.news
Government ❯ Politics ❯ Military
Deployment Deployment Issues Domestic Deployment Civil Unrest Troop Deployment Protests Deployment Plans Immigration Enforcement Federalization Deployment Costs Operations Immigration Shooting Incident Civilian Law Enforcement Urban Deployment Casualties California Deployment Orders Law Enforcement Civil Disturbance Judicial Review Activation Plans California National Guard Deployment Intervention Federal Troops Deployment in Civil Unrest Civil Rights Marine Corps Deployment in California Deployment Decisions US Immigration Policy Emergency Response Oregon National Guard California National Guard Chicago Legal Issues Community Engagement Portland Public Reaction Deployment of Forces Urban Patrols Troop Support Support Operations Caribbean Deployment Beautification Initiatives Arming Troops Federal Intervention Assistance Training Civil Disturbances Crime Prevention Urban Security Posse Comitatus Act Domestic Role Policing Civil Unrest Training Illinois National Guard Insurrection Act Deployments Deployment Strategies Trump Administration Civil-Military Relations Deployment Operations San Francisco Civilian Control Security Operations Public Safety Incidents Authoritarianism Military Service Federal Actions Federalization of National Guard State Control Infrastructure Operation Lonestar Domestic Law Enforcement U.S. Deployment Washington D.C. Deployment Authority Speeches Marines Legal Rulings Morale Issues Federal Control Conduct towards Military Personnel Response to Protests Troop Withdrawal Legal Authority Protest Response
The judge set a Dec. 11 effective date to allow an appeal after finding no statutory authority for crime‑deterrence missions, including out‑of‑state call‑ups.
