Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Breyer Weighs Legal Limits on Trump’s Federalized Guard in Los Angeles

A written ruling is expected in the coming weeks to clarify statutory and constitutional limits on deploying military forces domestically.

Image
U.S. Marines stand watch at a checkpoint as they guard a federal building, in Los Angeles, California, U.S. June 20, 2025. REUTERS/David Swanson/File Photo
Members of the California National Guard are deployed outside a complex of federal buildings in Santa Ana, California, U.S. June, 18, 2025.  REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo
California National Guard members are positioned at the Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles on June 10.

Overview

  • A three-day bench trial in San Francisco examined whether President Trump’s June federalization of California National Guard troops for immigration-related operations violated the Posse Comitatus Act.
  • Judge Charles Breyer repeatedly pressed Justice Department attorneys on the absence of clear statutory or constitutional guardrails and questioned what remedies would exist if the act applied.
  • The Justice Department argued the troops were serving a protective role under presidential authority to deploy state guards in emergencies rather than conducting domestic law enforcement.
  • The Ninth Circuit has stayed Breyer’s earlier injunction, allowing roughly 250 to 300 federalized guardsmen to remain active in Los Angeles pending the district court’s written decision.
  • Breyer’s forthcoming opinion, expected soon and likely to be appealed, could set a precedent on presidential power to use military forces within U.S. cities.