Conflict of Interest Impartiality Supreme Court Justices Supreme Court Ethics Political Ethics Legal Ethics Code of Conduct Recusal Professional Conduct Independence of Judiciary Supreme Court Disclosure Requirements Accountability Corruption Judicial Conduct Code of Ethics Transparency Legislative Ethics Accountability in Judiciary Government Accountability Justices' Conduct Financial Disclosure Transparency in Governance Partisanship Legal Accountability Financial Transparency Disclosure Rule of Law Clarence Thomas Integrity in Judiciary Recusal Standards Integrity in Justice Legal Interpretation Disclosure Guidelines Impartiality in Law Judicial Misconduct Justice Clarence Thomas Public Trust Juror Integrity Financial Disclosures Supreme Court Ethics Code Conflicts of Interest Disclosure Laws Fairness Fundraising Appearance of Impropriety Conduct of Judges Legal Responsibility Responding to Critics Judge's Relative's Employment Judicial Impartiality Binding Ethics Code Gag Orders Ethics of Supreme Court Justices Variability Ethics Violations Bias U.S. Supreme Court Judge Engoron Complaints Political Contributions U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Compliance Political Donations Gift Acceptance Workplace Harassment Conduct Supreme Court Code of Conduct Misconduct Media Ethics Legal Misconduct Financial Connections Critique of Authority Principles of Justice Judicial Activism Criticism of Justices Professional Integrity Abortion Rights Activism in Law Consistency in Judgments Trust in Institutions Asset Disclosure Constitutional Interpretation Post-Retirement Roles Recusal Process Respect for Judges Respect for Judiciary Separation of Powers Institutional Ethics Court Authority Post-Retirement Appointments Transparency in Judiciary Accountability in Law Enforcement Judicial Neutrality Caste and Ethics Gifts and Travel Disciplinary Standards Constitutional Morality Legal Reasoning Racial Bias
The measure has drawn separation-of-powers objections from legal advocates.
