Accountability Conflict of Interest Supreme Court Justices Corruption Recusal Judicial Independence Bias in Judiciary Judicial Accountability Judicial Review Impartiality Public Trust Investigations Allegations of Misconduct Courtroom Behavior Prosecutorial Misconduct Political Influence Supreme Court Impartiality in Judiciary Abuse of Power Constitutional Law Separation of Powers Ethics Guidelines Whistleblower Complaints Confirmation Hearings Prosecutorial Ethics Case Management Political Influence on Legal Proceedings Media Interviews Investigation Communication Rules Prosecutorial Discretion Executive Actions Judicial Duty Recommendations Traditions Judicial Responsibilities Complaints Against Judges Partisanship Misconduct Professional Backgrounds Judicial Appointments Government Influence Prevarication Whistleblower Protections Respectful Disagreement Meritocracy Judicial Opinions Allegations Against Judges Professional Associations Professional Responsibility Attorney General Actions Inquiry Panels Judicial Responsibility Confidentiality Institutional Integrity Court Protocols Judicial Corruption Political Contributions In-house Procedures Prevaricación Candidate Assessment Protection of Judges Privacy in Law Suo Motu Powers Deference to Executive Public Service Diversity Complaints and Inquiries Corruption in Judiciary Malafide Actions Appearance of Impropriety Contempt of Court Transparency in Law Judicial Relationships Court Dignity Counsel Responsibilities Court Orders Malpractice Public Statements Accessibility Recusal Procedures Forum Shopping Ministerial Responsibility Public Perception Whistleblowing Impeachment Court Proceedings Recusal Process Term Limits Ethics Codes Disclosure Requirements Code of Conduct Public Officials Court Clerk Misconduct Ethics Committees Gag Orders Court Procedures Bias in the Judiciary Gift Disclosures Enforcement Mechanisms
She says disputes with rulings reflect a decades-long conservative jurisprudence rather than evidence of misconduct.