Legal Requirements Naturalization Requirements Naturalization Process Regulations Legal Procedures Residency Requirements Naturalization Law Legal Rights Testing Procedures Legislative Proposals Legal Processes Legal Challenges Denaturalization Process Naturalization Executive Orders Temporary Visa Law Deportation Law Residency Law Judicial Processes Foreigners Tribunals National Allegiance Non-Muslim Migrants Proposed Changes Fraud Prevention Examination Requirements Dual Citizenship Denaturalization Procedures Legal Proceedings Supreme Court Precedents Good Moral Character Citizenship (Amendment) Act Naturalization Procedures Investment Regulations Regulatory Compliance Regulatory Bodies Investment Law Legal Protections Moral Character Assessment Moral Character Evaluation Dual Nationality Regulations Vetting Procedures CAA Provisions Exemption Orders Amendment Acts Statelessness Immigration and Foreigners Act Legal Standards Judicial Decisions Fraud in Immigration Deportation Procedures Testing Requirements Constitutional Law Naturalization Test Bureaucracy Renunciation of Citizenship Eligibility Requirements Legal Assistance Spanish Citizenship Law Naturalization Standards Enforcement Actions Dual Nationality Dual Citizenship Issues Denaturalization USCIS Regulations Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) Denaturalization Law Bill C-3 Policy Changes Fraud in Citizenship Family Links Revocation Procedures Grandchildren's Law Voting Rights Birthright Citizenship Legislation 14th Amendment Temporary Visas Birthright Citizenship Legal Status Right of Soil Legislation Refugee Status U.K. Citizenship Criminal Law Voter Rights Application Process Overseas Citizenship
The push faces strict legal thresholds and resource constraints that experts say make large-scale citizenship revocations unlikely to succeed in court.