Medication Abortion Legal Restrictions Healthcare Policy Health Policy Fetal Viability Legislation Legal Challenges Legislation Impact Patient Rights Abortion Restrictions Abortion Bans Legal Rights Women's Health Legal Implications Legal Issues Maternal Health Women's Health Rights Fertility Treatments Legal Regulations Contraception Emergency Contraception Public Opinion Viability Standards Medication Abortions Telemedicine Abortion Ban Legal Framework Viability Health Care Choices Funding Health Disparities Pregnancy Outcomes Abortion Care Challenges Healthcare Decisions Legal Frameworks Global Health Policies Telemedicine Services Healthcare Legislation Emergency Procedures Legal Precedents Minor's Rights Federal Protections Pregnancy Complications Government Interference Medical Care Abortion Legislation Pregnancy Public Opinion on Abortion Bodily Autonomy Women's Rights Planned Parenthood Fetal Rights Women's Reproductive Rights Roe v. Wade Emergency Contraceptives Texas Abortion Laws Medical Documentation IVF Access Medical Practice Patient's Health Access Barriers State Healthcare Policies Women's Health Care Exceptions in Abortion Medical Necessity IVF Services Healthcare Impact Emergency Abortions Gestational Limits Legislative Impact Abortion Procedure Gender Reassignment Surgery Interstate Abortion Personal Health Decisions Out-of-State Abortion Care Obstetrics Pregnancy Services Rural Health Issues Fetal Development Legal and Ethical Issues Minor Health Rights Medication Access Health Care Rights Medicaid Coverage Medical Regulations Physicians Federal Regulations Trimesters State Laws Cross-State Healthcare Public Health Abortion Policies Abortion Pills Maternal and Infant Mortality Medical Procedures Fetal Personhood Emergency Care Medical Professionals Patient Protection Physician Rights
The ruling applies Prop. 139’s standard, immediately restoring access curtailed by pre‑viability limits.
