Medication Abortion Legal Restrictions Health Policy Fetal Viability Legislation Healthcare Policy Legal Challenges Abortion Restrictions Patient Rights Legislation Impact Abortion Bans Legal Rights Women's Health Viability Standards Telemedicine Viability Medication Abortions Fertility Treatments Legal Regulations Abortion Ban Legal Framework Contraception Public Opinion Maternal Health Emergency Contraception Legal Barriers Emergency Services Women's Health Issues Support Organizations Health Care Choices Legal Implications Funding Health Disparities Pregnancy Outcomes Abortion Care Challenges Healthcare Decisions Legal Frameworks Global Health Policies Telemedicine Services Healthcare Legislation Emergency Procedures Legal Precedents Minor's Rights Federal Protections Pregnancy Complications Government Interference Medical Care Abortion Legislation Pregnancy Public Opinion on Abortion Bodily Autonomy Women's Rights Planned Parenthood Fetal Rights Women's Reproductive Rights Roe v. Wade Emergency Contraceptives Texas Abortion Laws Medical Documentation IVF Access Medical Practice Patient's Health Access Barriers State Healthcare Policies Women's Health Care Exceptions in Abortion Medical Necessity IVF Services Healthcare Impact Emergency Abortions Gestational Limits Legislative Impact Abortion Procedure Gender Reassignment Surgery Interstate Abortion Personal Health Decisions Out-of-State Abortion Care Obstetrics Rural Health Issues Fetal Development Legal and Ethical Issues Physicians Minor Health Rights Trimesters State Laws Cross-State Healthcare Public Health Abortion Policies Abortion Pills Maternal and Infant Mortality Medical Procedures Fetal Personhood Emergency Care Medical Professionals Patient Protection Physician Rights Abortion Care Advocates Fetal Anomaly Panel Discussion Contraceptive Access
The ruling preserves a 2024 state court decision blocking the law under Montana’s constitutional privacy protections.