Particle.news
Budget Cuts Federal Budget Fiscal Policy Efficiency Waste Reduction Wasteful Spending Misinformation Public Policy Defense Spending Budgeting Media Funding Defense Budget Spending Cuts Government Efficiency Entitlement Programs Waste and Fraud Federal Workforce Federal Agencies Fiscal Responsibility Legislation Subsidies Economic Policy Federal Policies Cost-Cutting Measures Oversight Health Research Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Budget Deficits Foreign Aid Bipartisan Agreements Budget Process Public Administration Department of Defense Cost-Cutting Initiatives USAID International Aid Media Payments Influence of Private Sector Corruption Media Subscriptions Department of Government Efficiency Negotiations Pentagon Treasury Department Public Opinion Fraud and Waste Fraud Efficiency Audits Legal Challenges Workforce Reduction Transparency Welfare Programs International Travel Procurement Fraudulent Spending Personnel Changes Tax Policy Travel Policies Deficit Fraud Reporting Federal Spending Cuts Federal Employment Contracts Federal Budget Cuts Pharmaceutical Subsidies Drug Pricing Executive Orders Federal Properties Corporate Welfare Research Funding Animal Research Political Disputes Efficiency Programs Campaigns Debt Relief Criticism Cost Estimates Expense Claims Tax Cuts Brexit Asylum Policies Travel Expenses Federal Debt Budget Deficit Entitlements State-Funded Wall Technology Funding Efficiency Commissions International Visits Public Relations International Relations National Debt Public Accountability Social Programs Discretionary Spending Bureaucracy Public Funding Public Expenditure Cost Reduction Bipartisanship
The Department of Government Efficiency now projects $150 billion in savings, down from the initial $1 trillion goal, as experts question the credibility of its methods.
