Government ❯International Relations
International Criminal Court War Crimes International Court of Justice Human Rights Criminal Justice Military Actions Maritime Law United Nations Sanctions Crimes Against Humanity UN Charter Humanitarian Law Extradition Treaties Extradition Interpol Human Rights Law Aviation Treaties Sovereignty Issues Human Rights Violations Territorial Disputes Sovereignty Self-Defense Rights Court Decisions Criminal Courts Cross-Border Surrogacy Terrorism Criminal Investigations Arrest Warrants Customary International Law Copyright Treaties Refugee Protection Courts Reparations Military Conduct Cross-Border Investigations Violations Asylum-Seekers Arms Sales Seabed Mining Regulations Territorial Integrity Multilateralism Accountability Universal Jurisdiction Anti-Corruption Treaties Corruption Conventions Corruption Treaties Treaties Violation of International Law EU Asylum Regulations UN Charter Violations Military Law Judicial Proceedings Nuclear Non-Proliferation U.N. Charter Human Rights Treaties Genocide Convention Hague Service Convention Environmental Regulations Statelessness Conventions Conventions State Sovereignty International Criminal Law War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity ICC Arrest Warrants Climate Change Court Rulings Geneva Conventions ICC International Liability Space Law National Interests UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Freedom of Navigation Territorial Sovereignty South China Sea Violations of Sovereignty Self-Determination Prisoner Rights Declaration on the Conduct of Parties Territorial Claims Legal Claims
The executive branch requested the Supreme Court clear its July through August agendas to enable the reconfigured bench to align its ruling with an international human rights decision.