Legal Precedents Justices Legal Decisions Legal Proceedings Court Decisions Rulings Legal Reforms Case Law Court Cases Judicial Review Legal Cases Judges Legal Appeals Ministers Legal Challenges Judicial Appointments Legal Interpretation Legal Authority Judicial Decisions Legal Framework Constitutional Law Chief Justice Judicial Independence Legal Rulings Election Procedures Case Review Clarence Thomas Court Rulings Justice System Court Orders Presidential Immunity Legal Interpretations Legal Rights Presidential Powers District Court Judicial Reform Justice Neil Gorsuch Ministerial Changes Judicial Specialization Ethics Legal Review State Courts Decisions Congress Cases Supreme Court Justices Case Decisions Leadership Trial Procedures Civil Rights Cases Judicial Authority Electoral Tribunal Certiorari Process Tax Disputes Access to Justice Induction Indigenous Affairs Electoral Oversight Political Influence Collegium System Court Composition Functions Case Management Transition Judicial Year Indigenous Representation Meetings Legal Experts Case Scheduling Events Term Schedule Legal Recognition Record Preservation Judicial Correspondence Tenure Public Hearings STF Voting Rights Act Judicial Actions Legal Certainty Judicial Roles Military Tribunal Legal Procedures High Court Investigative Procedures Legal Frameworks Conservative Justices Legal Terminology Senate Judiciary Committee Justice Kavanaugh Legal Representation Justice Neil M. Gorsuch Lower Courts Immunity Decisions Judicial Security State Supreme Court Election Cases Dissenting Opinions Appointments Certiorari
Several justices indicated that determining persecution is a fact-driven inquiry, pointing toward a standard that limits appellate courts to deferential review.
