Law ❯ Constitutional Law ❯ First Amendment
Press Rights Social Media Regulation Viewpoint Discrimination Media Rights Legal Challenges TikTok Ban Political Expression Legal Cases Protest Rights Political Speech Conversion Therapy Flag Desecration Retaliation Symbolic Speech Government Regulation Government Overreach Religious Freedom Retaliation Claims Censorship Academic Freedom Press Freedom Legislation Government Actions Drag Performances Flag Burning Artistic Expression Media Freedom Prior Restraint Legal Actions Public Broadcasting Legal Rights Content Moderation Social Media Social Media Rights Public Gatherings Media Relations LGBTQ+ Rights Due Process Union Activities Criminalizing False Statements Protection of False Statements Violation of Freedom of Speech Legal Protection Drag Show Regulations Judicial Campaigns Library Policies Social Media Platform Regulation Social Media Platforms Nonstarters Selective and Vindictive Prosecution Social Media Accounts Trademark Registration Government Intimidation Intimidation Tactics Controversial Speakers Drag Shows Prohibition of Lewd Performances Gag Orders Gag Order Protected Speech Pro-life Speech Abortion Speech Gun Control Demonstration Peaceful Protest Insurrection Incitement of Violence Adult Films Political Party Primaries Political Advocacy Texas Law Book Rating System Espionage Act Journalism School Policies TikTok Legal Case Workplace Regulations Corporate Speech Coercion vs. Persuasion Classroom Discussions Corporate Free Speech Disney Lawsuit Retaliation Against Legal Representation Discrimination in Media Access Academic Institutions Legal Disputes Higher Education Legal Complaints Legal Protections Media Independence Legal Challenges in Education Public Broadcasting Rights Judicial Rulings Immigration Rights Hurley v. GLIB AI and Speech Lawsuits Political Retaliation Public Expression Social Media Regulations Judicial Decisions
The ruling finds the vendor rating scheme unconstitutionally compelled speech, cementing earlier appellate conclusions.