Higher Education Examinations Legal Education School Policies Legal Studies Title IX Parental Rights Law School Censorship Discrimination Academic Freedom Religion Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Admissions Public Education LGBTQ+ Politics Curriculum Affirmative Action Charter Schools LGBTQ+ Rights Free Speech Gender Identity First Amendment Regulations University Policies Civil Rights Segregation College Admissions Society Schools Public Schools Private Schools Disability Rights Religious Freedom Sexual Harassment Programs Transgender Students Student Protests Licensing School Districts Religious Charter School Religious Liberty Social Issues Disciplinary Actions Bullying Gender Studies School Employee Tenure Race Relations School Admissions Criminal Justice Scholarships Howard University Policy Geography Tulane University School District Investigation Student Government Gun Laws Teacher Training Notification Policies Restrictions University Law School Antisemitism Campus Protests Sexual Assault Student Activism Legal Implications Protests Violence Student Rights Judges Negotiations Administrative Actions Supreme Court Religious Rights Public Funding Career Development Religious Education Institutions Discipline Diversity and Inclusion Safety Regulations Employment Law School Regulations Sports Law Public School Policy Results Sports Application Process Internships Mental Health Diversity Initiatives Entrance Exams Online Learning Public Policy Academic Integrity Standards Minority Rights Undergraduate Programs
Judges treated the pronoun and confidentiality rules as neutral conditions of public employment.
