Defense Strategies Civil Rights Human Rights Pardons Prison Reform Public Interest Law NGOs Criminal Justice Public Policy Bar Associations Attorney General District Attorney ACLU Criminal Justice Reform Justice System Judicial Influence Public Perception Policy Views Reproductive Rights Advocacy Bar Council of India Public Statements Judicial Review Judicial Decisions Consumer Rights Movement Prosecution Prosecutorial Discretion Christian Nationalism State Attorneys General Liberal Groups Supreme Court Public Protests Environmental Policy Animal Welfare Legislation Governor's Role Defense Attorneys Court Decisions NGO Involvement Clemency Requests Court Rulings Judicial Independence Public Interest Litigation Clemency Family Rights OAB Amicus Briefs Court Hearings Rights of Individuals State Authority Political Organizations Defense Counsel Public Safety Constitutional Rights Innocence Project Attorney General Actions Human Rights Advocacy Criminal Defense Rights of the Accused Social Activism Community Rights American Bar Association Rights Movements Civil Rights Groups Conservative Movements Clemency Hearings Letters to Election Officials
The ruling follows defense complaints that attendance limits plus a device ban undermined the right to a public trial.
