Cybersecurity Voting Process Foreign Interference Polling Stations Foreign Influence Misinformation Voting Rights Voting Procedures Polling Arrangements Voter Registration Polling Process Threats Election Monitoring Polling Security Disinformation Threats to Election Workers Voting Systems Political Violence Election Integrity Election Officials Disinformation Campaigns Voter Eligibility Voter Fraud Threats to Candidates Election Interference Cyber Threats Voter Safety Law and Order Voting Integrity Polling Places Voter ID Laws Threat Assessment Voter Fraud Claims Security Measures Security Arrangements Intelligence Agencies Voting Methods Cyber Interference Voter Protection Polling Station Management Threats to Officials Poll Worker Protection Counting Process Polling Station Security Election Day Terrorism Threats Deepfakes Mail-in Voting Threats to Voting Polling Sites Transparency Political Campaigns Voter Rights Infrastructure Domestic Extremism Ballot Integrity Voter Manipulation Election Denialism State and Federal Courts Ballot Access Ballot Box Integrity Local Governments Voting Disruptions Violence Prevention Public Trust Public Perception State Agencies Voting Security Unrest Voter Turnout Bomb Threats Public Safety Election Day Events Digital Platforms Polling Booths Sabotage Disinformation Governance Board Deployment of Forces Special Counsel Investigation Controversial Devices Georgia Elections Police Involvement Voting System Software Voter Suppression Partnerships CISA Online Platforms Incidents Threats to Election Officials Breach of Sensitive Voting Information Election Threats Task Force Formation EU Parliamentary Elections Threats to Democracy Non-Citizen Voting AI Technology 2020 Presidential Election Central Armed Police Forces Surveillance Measures Election Process
The case is the latest in a federal campaign to force states to share voter data so the DOJ can test compliance with list-maintenance rules.
