Particle.news
Public Discourse Political Discourse Public Reaction Social Media Public Opinion Digital Rights Media Ethics Political Pressure Hate Speech Political Influence Government Power Public Policy Tech Regulation User Privacy Government Actions Activism Government Regulation Social Media Platforms Public Debate University Policies Literature and Society Artistic Expression Brazil Legal Rights Disinformation Misinformation Media Bias Religious Sensitivity Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Political Accountability Content Moderation Public Interest Social Media Impact Content Creation AI Ethics Political Agenda Online Expression Legal Threats National Security User Rights Political Polarization Online Speech Youth Culture Ethics Social Media Influence Ideological Bias Chilling Effect Digital Civil Liberties International Perspectives Legal Issues Journalistic Integrity Political Propaganda Political Expression Social Media Censorship School Libraries Media Representation Conservative Viewpoints Expression Bias Criticism Public Participation Cancel Culture Digital Platforms Psychological Harm Choice Digital Town Square LGBTQ+ Rights Legal Framework Public Safety Literature Media Relations Unconstitutional Application Legal Case Advertising Court Cases Conservative Speech Political Activism Community Response Digital Ethics Totalitarianism Media Responsibility Government Influence
The court has given authorities six weeks to explain why a December notification empowering police officers to order online content removals does not exceed legal limits.
