Particle.news
Exoneration Post Office Scandal Miscarriages of Justice Central Park Five Death Penalty Legal Proceedings Exonerations Police Misconduct Innocence Projects Eyewitness Testimony Compensation DNA Evidence Compensation Claims Forensic Evidence Innocence Innocence Project Shaken Baby Syndrome Witness Testimony Media Influence Scientific Evidence Postmasters' Rights Expert Testimony Racial Bias Conviction Integrity Units Eyewitness Identification Appeal Specialists Evidence Tampering Autism and the Justice System Appeals Pardons Prosecutorial Misconduct Central Park Five Case Faulty Investigation Evidence Eyewitness Evidence Murder Conviction New Evidence Legal Reform Kathleen Folbigg Investigations Jeffrey Prible 1989 Murder Case Legal Blindness Conviction Review Unit Prison Sentences Legal System Post Office IT Scandal Posthumous Exoneration Post Office Horizon Scandal Marcellus Williams Murder Convictions Vacating Convictions Exoneration Processes Impact on Crime Victims Overturned Convictions Legal Representation Legal Reforms Legal Settlements Legal Redress Horizon Scandal Accountability Public Inquiry Compensation Schemes Ex Gratia Payments Public Inquiries Death Sentences Compensation for Victims 911 Calls Systemic Issues Prosecution Misconduct Brooklyn Prosecutors Interrogation Practices Judicial Process Judicial Proceedings Murder Charges Re-trials Sub-Postmasters Case Forensic Science Civil Rights Case Studies Overturning Convictions Guildford Four Rubin "Hurricane" Carter Legal Commentary Legal Cases International Law Federal Cases Legal Ethics
A judge set aside the 1998 verdict after declaring the bite‑mark evidence not scientifically defensible.
