Legal Advocacy Advocacy Historical Injustices Family Advocacy Campaigning Public Awareness Reparations Family Impact Legal Rights Survivor Advocacy Legal Reforms Compensation Claims Public Outcry Abuse Allegations State Accountability Accountability Legal Representation Public Protests Public Opinion Police Accountability Collective Memory Abuse Scandals Public Outrage Witness Protection False Allegations Drug War Victims Disaster Response Legal Action Crime Prevention Public Advocacy Post-Apartheid Issues Legal Settlements Political Accountability Political Activism Financial Compensation Gun Control Issues Fair Trial Systemic Failures Compensation Awareness Horizon IT Scandal Community Response Domestic Abuse Housing Issues Collectives Disappearance Cases Support for Victims Paramilitarism Legal Compensation Legal Proceedings Injustice Transparency Sexual Abuse Advocacy Groups Legal Reform Police Violence Public Perception Legal Accountability Crime Victim Compensation Public Apologies Legal Challenges Compensation for Victims Holocaust Education Legal Aid Legal Aid Expansion Memory and Recognition Economic Impact of Disasters Public Inquiries Road Accident Victims Media Coverage Historical Memory Compensation Issues Political Influence Testimonies Support Networks Public Inquiry Post Office Scandal Historical Conflicts Legal Redress Financial Redress Child Abuse Legal Repercussions Community Activism Torture Legal Victories Community Impact Public Sentiment Sub-postmasters Redress Mechanisms
The judge condemned paratroopers for unlawfully shooting unarmed civilians but ruled the core hearsay evidence could not prove the defendant fired the fatal shots.