Public Policy Sports Participation Public Opinion Public Perception Healthcare Access Athletics Youth Advocacy Gender Identity Military Service Discrimination Youth Healthcare Youth Rights Activism Youth Sports Gender Equality Social Justice Military Inclusion Sports Inclusion Athletic Participation Legal Recognition Workplace Inclusion Legislation Legal Challenges Education Family Dynamics Athlete Inclusion Youth Participation Civil Rights Political Discourse Athlete Participation Youth Care Community Support Education Policy Community Response Education Access Incarceration Legal Protections Health Care Access Public Spaces Parental Rights Healthcare Policy Political Representation Public Protests Sports Equity Military Policy Prison System Athletics Participation Workplace Equality Access to Healthcare Public Safety Medical Ethics Advocacy Political Activism Pronouns Free Speech Public Facilities Sports Public Education Youth Sports Participation Identity Bathroom Policies Community Impact Athlete Representation Mental Health Violence Against Transgender People Legal Changes Advocacy Groups Youth Health Violence Against LGBTQ+ Women's Rights Immigration Transgender Day of Visibility Cisgender vs Transgender Military and Society Social Conservatism Health Risks Visibility Queer Representation Bathroom Bills Youth Issues Transgender Representation Public Discourse Advocacy Organizations Workplace Rights Student-Athletes Youth Parenting Healthcare Advocacy Athlete Advocacy Social Inclusion Non-Binary Identity Public Controversies Healthcare Feminism Youth Healthcare Access Public Awareness Cyber Abuse Cultural Politics Religious Beliefs Sports Culture
The en banc court found likely First Amendment violations, ordering a tailored injunction.