Victim Advocacy Legal Proceedings Victims' Rights Victims Legal Cases Victim Rights Public Figures Rape Public Perception Victimization Victim Support Child Protection Legal Consequences Public Response Child Abuse Allegations Public Reaction Public Safety Legal Accountability Victim Testimonies Domestic Abuse Victim Impact Legal System Gang Rape Sexual Assault Assault Consent Issues Victim Testimony Victimology Victims Rights Institutional Abuse Survivor Stories Grooming Gangs Consent Chemical Submission Trafficking Public Awareness Military Personnel Public Discourse Victim Resources Abuse Victim Experience Human Trafficking Online Safety Prison System Accusers Workplace Harassment Public Awareness Campaigns Grooming Legal Response to Sexual Assault Prevention Measures Sexual Harassment Conflict-related Sexual Violence Hostage Needle-Spiking Gang-Rape Child Safety Marital Abuse Substance Abuse Youth Protection Youth Crime Media Coverage Legal Reforms Reporting Trends Legal Trials Cultural Issues Harvey Weinstein Graphic Content Legal Protections Awareness Police Misconduct Religious Institutions Accusations Public Reactions Law Enforcement MeToo Movement Legal Action Domestic Violence Judicial System Minors Legal Outcomes Rape Prevention Victim Behavior Statistics Rape Statistics Public Outcry Educational Institutions Drug-Facilitated Assault Campus Safety Stalking Youth Organizations Cultural Impact Harassment Assaults Hostage Situations Survivorship Incarceration
The ruling centers on grooming that the court said he used to control a 14-year-old.
