Journalism Censorship Journalism Ethics Investigative Journalism Journalistic Integrity Media Criticism Independent Media First Amendment Government Influence Media Coverage Editorial Independence Media Ethics Access to Information Political Commentary Journalistic Ethics Court Reporting Government Relations Journalists Media Regulation Political Reporting Defamation Reporting Restrictions Challenges Media Censorship World Press Freedom Index Government Control White House Press Independent Journalism Social Media Media Control Media Ownership International Journalism Hong Kong Global Rankings Media Relations Media Restrictions Lawsuits Media Influence Media Independence Legislation International Media Legal Issues Government Restrictions Journalism in Conflict Zones Government Regulations Information Disclosure Journalist Safety India Attacks on Journalists Public Interest Information Access Local News Journalistic Rights Freedom of Expression Activism Public Broadcasting Public Statements Legal Reporting Democracy Violence Against Journalists Government Accountability Legal Challenges First Amendment Rights Satire State Control Detained Journalists White House Correspondents' Association Hong Kong Media Media Rights Al Jazeera Media Protests Diversity in Media Ownership Journalists' Safety Impact of Legislation Turkey Media Organizations Defamation Law Whistleblowing Journalistic Access Media Access Government Policy Gag Orders Censorship in Media Global Trends Political Influence Information Dissemination Government Policies Foreign Correspondents Broadcasting Media Outlets Threats to Journalists Fact-Checking Media Tycoons Media Bias Satirical Journalism Journalist Arrests Media Suppression Journalism in Conflict National Security Censorship Issues
The filing alleges Gordon Kromberg withheld the Privacy Protection Act from the magistrate who approved the warrant, warranting expedited discipline up to disbarment.
