Data Privacy Foreign Policy Foreign Relations Foreign Ownership Foreign Influence Export Controls Surveillance Law Enforcement Counterterrorism Social Media Regulation Data Protection Identification Standards Defense Policy Intelligence Agencies TikTok Ban Economic Policy Data Protection Laws Classified Information Foreign Adversaries TikTok Technology Biden Administration Cybersecurity Public Safety House of Representatives Foreign Investment Hong Kong Bipartisan Support Judicial Actions Emergency Powers Immigration Chinese Ownership Funding Bill Military Funding Article 23 Domestic Legislation Foreign-Owned Apps Safeguarding National Security Bill Bipartisan Efforts U.S. House of Representatives Privacy Concerns First Amendment Foreign Adversary Control TikTok Legislation Ownership Data Security Basic Law Senate Intelligence Committee Tax Credits Emergency Shelters Public Consultations Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act Privacy Biosecure Act Foreign Aid Intelligence Collection Divestment National Security Threats Legal Challenges Department of Justice Corporate Regulation Chinese Government REAL ID Act Crisis Management Beijing Influence Intelligence Operations Real ID Counter-Terrorism Measures Counter-Terrorism Laws Trade Policy Trade Agreements Militant Groups Foreign Intelligence Political Pressure Divestiture Laws Iran Drone Regulations Space Infrastructure Investment Regulations Defense Legislation Policy Intentions FBI Investigations Homeland Security Human Rights Military Operations Nuclear Law Regulatory Actions Data Regulation Executive Orders Foreign Adversary Applications Act Military Government Actions SAFE CHIPS Act Information Control Survival-Threatening Situations Defense Policies Political Stability Terrorism Classification Data Access Border Control
The initiative remains aspirational, raising constitutional questions over targeting religious adherence.