Civil Rights Posse Comitatus Act Use of Force Civil Liberties Legal Orders Insurrection Act Judicial Review Wehrpflicht Uniform Code of Military Justice National Guard Deployment Service Regulations Legal Obligations Foreign Troops Regulation Domestic Law Enforcement Gender Discrimination War Powers Foreign Troops Authorization Pakistan Army Act Armed Forces Tribunal Legal Consequences State Authority State Militia Law Service Members Rights Federal Authority Pakistan Army Act 1952 Discrimination Law Judicial Authority Service Requirements Rules of Engagement Recruitment Law Unlawful Directives Judicial Reforms Conscription Legal Authority Domestic Military Intervention Civilian Oversight Illegal Orders International Law Recruitment Procedures Foreign Troops Preemptive Legal Actions Nuclear Law Rights and Obligations Wehrgerechtigkeit Domestic Policing National Guard Sovereignty Issues Use of Military Force Judicial Decisions War Crimes Discrimination Domestic Military Operations Legal Appeals Emergency Powers Civilian Rights Judicial Power Army Chief Tenure Governance Reserve Duty Orders and Protocols Public Order
The ruling requires the Pentagon to keep the named plaintiffs in uniform and leaves the new-recruit ban in place with an appeal to higher courts expected.
