Nuclear Proliferation NATO Military Alliances Nuclear Threats Regional Conflicts Nuclear Weapons International Alliances NATO Relations Threat Assessment Terrorism Nuclear Arms Race Military Strategy U.S. Foreign Policy Russia Russia-Ukraine Conflict US Foreign Policy International Relations International Cooperation European Security Arms Race Alliances Nuclear Deterrence Nuclear Arms Control Regional Stability Military Threats Military Technology Russian Aggression Power Dynamics Strategic Partnerships Threats Ukraine Conflict Military Capabilities U.S.-Russia Relations Transatlantic Relations Energy Security Sanctions US-Russia Relations Military Presence Nuclear Powers US-China Relations Nuclear Security Nuclear Arsenals Russia's Expansionism Arms Control Russian Threats U.S.-Europe Relations Russia-Ukraine War NATO Involvement Conflict Resolution Intelligence Operations Nuclear Escalation Military Operations Escalation of Violence Terrorism Threats Nuclear Capabilities NATO Alliances Transnational Threats Neutral Countries Defense Strategies Ukraine Military Resources Eastern Europe Drone Threats Collective Defense Naval Competition NATO Dynamics U.S.-Ukraine Relations Shipping Disruptions Quad Alliance Post-War Order Defense Industry Western Relations Indo-Pacific Strategy European Stability Military Dependence US Foreign Relations Maritime Trade Nuclear Apartheid Sovereignty Issues Nuclear Agreements NATO Influence U.S. Role Economic Sanctions Multilateralism Asia-Pacific Region Iran-Israel Relations Counterterrorism European Union Nuclear Arms Treaties Military Power Threat Perception Ukraine War Impact Adversarial Nations Peacekeeping Challenges Conflict Zones Peace Efforts Conflict Areas Peacekeeping Missions Indo-Pacific Relations Terrorism and Extremism
The White House frames the restrictions as a national-security measure tied to screening deficiencies.
