High Court Sentencing Appeals Sentencing Guidelines Case Dismissals Case Outcomes Public Safety Family Law Injunctions Environmental Law Dismissals Supreme Court Rulings Interim Orders Corruption Cases Case Dismissal Sentencing Hearings Sentencing Outcomes Judge Juan Merchan Conditional Discharge Defendant Statements Political Cases Ineligibility Family Disputes Inquests District Attorney Education Law Victim Impact Statements Rights in Legal Proceedings Traffic Regulations Judgment Quality Political Speech Delhi High Court Dismissal of Claims First Amendment Judgment Analysis Dismissal of Lawsuits Funeral Regulations Sanctions Trial Process Administrative Law Trial Delays Debt Recovery National Security Law Transparency Educational Law Public Interest Litigation Bench Composition Family Court Religious Cases Cognisance Mental Health Law Legal Rights Sports Law Interim Injunctions Public Order Public Interest Gag Orders Corporate Law Regulations Rulings Contempt of Court Eviction Cases Discovery Youth Justice Property Law Mental Health Defense Temporary Injunctions Legal Procedures Evidence Hearings Damages Pro Hac Vice Admission Final Judgments Examination Fairness Election Law Land Use Victim Impact Enforcement Directorate High Court Cases High Court Appeals Protests Evidence Verdicts Government Transparency Protest Regulations Evidence in Court Violent Disorder Federal Cases Sentencing Delays Public Prosecutor Enforcement of Judgments Evidence Disclosure
The ruling preserves a pivotal statement for jurors after the court found the 13-year-old’s Miranda waiver valid.