Copyright Corporate Law Trade Secrets Antitrust Defamation Contract Law Copyright Infringement Copyright Issues Technology Law Privacy Law Advertising Law Competition Law Contracts Antitrust Law Music Rights Data Privacy Entertainment Law Defamation Law OpenAI Identity Issues Royalties Data Protection Music Industry Digital Rights App Store Regulations Trademark Disputes Media Rights Unfair Competition Trademark Infringement Social Media Law Trademark Issues Trademark Name Rights Patent Law Media Law Employment Law Data Theft Confidentiality Agreements Contract Disputes Confidentiality Consumer Rights Cyber Law Consumer Protection Corporate Lawsuit Copyright Law Consent Name Image and Likeness User Rights Impersonation Sports Memorabilia Breach of Contract Streaming Rights Corporate Governance Video Game Development Licensing Agreements Patent Infringement Corporate Litigation Distribution Agreements Branding Issues Technology Disputes Branding Image Rights Identity Rights Social Media In-App Purchases Identity Confusion Divestiture Laws Privacy Rights Antitrust Issues Estate Law Technology Leaks Right of Publicity Name and Likeness Rights Computer Fraud Publishing Rights Publishing Monopolistic Practices Rights of Publicity NFTs Censorship Exploitation Land Use Corporate Lawsuits Property Law Property Disputes Ownership Disputes Ownership Claims Sports Law Lawsuits Academic Publishing Scientific Integrity Copyrights Video Games NIL Rights Cryptocurrency Film Law Sports Collectibles First Amendment Rights Federal Laws False Advertising
The Arizona filing argues a 1991 confidentiality clause is unenforceable due to Axl Rose's absence from the signatures.