Particle.news
Threats Stalking Defamation Legal Consequences Legal Proceedings Online Harassment Online Threats Legal Cases Defamation Cases Intimidation Threatening Behavior Cyberharassment Offensive Communication Doxing Anonymous Threats Threats of Violence Threatening Communications False Statements Image Exploitation Digital Harassment Blackmail Legal Charges Cyberbullying Slander Doxxing Sexual Harassment Gender Violence Cyberstalking Legal Action Offensive Communications Investigation Malicious Communications Minor Protection Telecommunications Harassment Threats to Individuals Family Crime Ciberasedio Image Manipulation Privacy Violations Invasion of Privacy School Bullying Electronic Disclosure False Reporting Surveillance Extortion Impersonation Obscene Messaging Victims Social Media Harassment Image Abuse Voyeurism Electronic Harassment Interstate Communication Crimes Electronic Communication Electronic Communication Harassment Digital Threats Identity Theft Electronic Communications Obscenity Abuse Digital Communication Obscenity Laws Online Privacy Offensive Behavior Social Media Intimate Image Abuse Fraud Social Media Threats Sexual Offenses Political Bias Public Insult Misogyny Public Insults Assault Telephone Harassment Racial Harassment Racist Messaging Social Media Policies Telecommunications Offenses Foreign Influence Online Safety Act Telecommunications Law Financial Harassment Insulting Behavior Political Harassment Cyber Harassment Targeting Individuals Digital Privacy Violations Online Behavior Digital Abuse eBay harassment case Privacy Breach Unauthorized Access Pranks Injunctions Obscene Communication Obscene Communications Public Disturbance Privacy Invasion Domestic Issues
The court treated the coordinated online attacks as criminal harassment, pairing penalties with training and temporary social‑media suspensions.
