Political Leadership Corruption Political Scandals Investigations Transparency Political Accountability Public Officials Media Relations Political Responsibility Political Ethics Judicial System Law Enforcement Political Parties Media Oversight Oversight Committees Political Corruption Political Criticism Public Trust Transparency Issues Corruption Investigations Crisis Management Public Safety Public Statements Judicial Oversight Political Oversight Parliamentary Procedures Public Policy Military Oversight Security Measures Public Relations Ministerial Conduct Political Discourse Ministerial Responsibility Defense Policy Political Promises Political Responses Taxation Political Investigations Parliament Public Funding Budgeting Security Issues Oversight Ministerial Standards Legislative Actions Statistical Agencies Policy Failures Justice Department Espionage Investigative Agencies Transparency in Government Anti-Corruption Commission Public Interest Military Accountability Public Service Commissions Human Rights Parliamentary Sessions Parliamentary Oversight Public Protests Public Broadcasting Corruption Allegations Government Officials Department of Justice Data Transparency Public Inquiries Anti-Corruption Agencies Media Influence Watchdog Organizations Political Figures Political Leaders Fraud Investigative Bodies Media Accountability Public Works Political Controversies Vetting Processes Judicial Independence Legal Cases Public Health Policy Public Servants Diplomatic Relations Political Influence Public Inquiry Leadership Rebel Groups Attorney General Actions Media Access Federal Agencies Ethics Committees Press Freedom Political Strategy Tracking Payments Political Donations Public Health Government Spending Ethics in Government Checks and Balances Leadership Criticism Federal Aviation Administration Oversight Mechanisms
The outreach through Capitol security channels coincides with a Pentagon referral of Senator Mark Kelly’s conduct to the Navy for a report due Dec. 10.