Protest Rights Censorship Legal Challenges Hate Speech Press Rights Legal Cases Legal Controversies Protests Censorship Laws Religious Freedom Police Actions Public Order Legal Actions Political Protests Judicial Decisions Protest Laws Legal Proceedings Campus Policies Student Demonstrations Company Policies Protest Law Hate Speech Legislation LGBTQ+ Advocacy University Conduct Rules Intimidation Lawsuits Legal Frameworks Legal Constraints Political Rights Legislation Right to Protest Government Authority Government Surveillance Regulations Dress Code Legislation Judicial System Government Actions LGBTQ+ Rights Political Repression Public Decency Religious Attire House Arrest Internet Law Press Freedom Political Expression Venue Policies Sports Law Online Safety Police Powers Defamation Legal Decisions Police Action Interpretation of Gestures Legal Amendments Public Demonstrations Media Rights Legal Protections Arrests Regulation of Protests Protest Regulations Litigation Digital Rights First Amendment Due Process Religious Symbols Academic Expression Threats and Intimidation Academic Integrity Proscribed Organizations Repression Arrest and Detention Public Behavior Political Arrests Regulatory Oversight Political Discrimination Legal Issues in Censorship Journalism Abortion Legislation Pro-Life Activism Legal Restrictions Political Symbols Demonstrations University Policies Antisemitism
The case highlights Russia’s use of “foreign agent” labels to police culture through broad “discrediting” rules.