Free Speech Freedom of Speech Media Law Religious Freedom Legal Challenges Political Speech Press Rights Freedom of the Press Censorship Laws Due Process Academic Freedom Censorship Freedom of Expression Civil Liberties Press Freedom Legal Actions Free Speech Protections Legal Cases Hate Speech Legislation Legal Proceedings Education Law Higher Education Law Media Access Legal Precedents Judicial Review Litigation Social Media Regulation Supreme Court Cases Judicial Decisions Free Speech Issues Viewpoint Discrimination Government Actions Hate Speech Federal Funding Media Regulations Symbolic Speech Legal Disputes Freedom of Assembly Government Regulation Flag Desecration Lawsuits Political Expression Non-Citizen Rights Free Speech in Education Educational Institutions Government Regulations Equal Protection Clause Artistic Expression Press Freedom Cases Press Restrictions Judicial Rulings Government Censorship Government Oversight Presidential Immunity Government Authority Discrimination Law Legal Standards Privacy Rights Social Media Press Access Legal Defense Legal Threats Employment Law Civil Rights Laws Legal Representation Protected Speech Higher Education Court Decisions Political Retaliation Peaceful Assembly Judicial System Labor Law Parental Rights Legal Restrictions Campaign Finance Regulations Noncitizens Rights Federal Guidelines Religious Freedom Laws Retaliation Treason Legal Consequences Judicial Precedents Government Speech Censorship Law Supreme Court Rulings Separation of Church and State Government Overreach Academic Rights Law Enforcement Government Influence Employment Rights Speech Limitations Government Coercion Media Regulation Free Speech Rights Public vs Private Sector Second Amendment Rights Public Employee Rights Political Violence Press Protections
Paxton says the local chapters cannot sue because Abbott’s order targets CAIR’s national entity.