State Law Military Law Judicial Review Immigration Law Administrative Law Posse Comitatus Act Judicial Decisions National Guard Law Enforcement Impoundment Control Act Election Law Civil Rights Insurrection Act Election Regulations Tax Law 10th Amendment Judicial Authority Civil Rights Law Trade Law Education Law Funding Regulations Home Rule Act Anti-Money Laundering Executive Orders State Rights Government Accountability Tariffs Presidential Authority Title 10 Taxation Executive Power State Sovereignty Higher Education Law Judicial Proceedings Supremacy Clause Executive Authority Supreme Court Antideficiency Act Legal Proceedings Military Deployment Telecommunications Law Legal Rulings Preemption Legal Challenges Military Authority Judicial Interpretation Presidential Accountability Court Cases National Guard Deployment Trade Regulations Land Use Law Tenth Amendment Litigation Redistricting Law Regulatory Law Monetary Policy Judicial Appointments Financial Equalization Laws Presidential Records Agency Reorganization Education Funding Legal Actions Presidential Powers FACE Act Gun Regulations Local Law X Amendment Anti-Deficiency Act Government Spending Judicial Precedent Financial Regulations Amendments Judicial Reforms Government Compliance Military Involvement Government Regulations Pre-emption Tax Regulations Emergency Powers Law International Law Budget Law Federal Reserve Act Regulatory Framework Independent Agencies Political Accountability Federal Vacancies Reform Act Home Distilling Health Law Voting Rights Militia Clauses Legislative Proposals Budgetary Provisions Legislation Appointments Legal Precedents Voting Legislation Gift Acceptance Security Regulations Procedural Issues Civil Rights Violations
The complaint says the measures violate the Supremacy Clause, expose agents to doxxing or violence, and could lead to appeals that reach the Supreme Court.
