Trump Administration Immigration Policy Legal Challenges Federal Funding Education Reform Policy Changes Pardons National Security Government Efficiency Presidential Authority Legal Profession Donald Trump Biden Administration Immigration Reform Federal Authority Legal Implications Presidential Powers Legal Targeting Free Speech Federal Government Law Firms Legal Representation Diversity and Inclusion Censorship Immigration Enforcement Flag Burning Federal-State Relations Judicial Review Military Policy Government Accountability Legal Controversies Civil Rights Alien Enemies Act Media Relations Terminations Government Policy Federal Agencies Environmental Policy Crime Emergency Autopen Usage State Legislation Financial Institutions Geographical Renaming Diversity Initiatives Voting Regulations Education Policy Law Enforcement Trade Policy Government Restructuring Cultural Institutions Declassification Government Reorganization National Guard Deployment Federal Intervention Media Regulation Legal System Healthcare Funding Funding Cuts Investigations Antisemitism Public Service Loan Forgiveness Security Clearances Federal Budget Impact on Communities Tariffs Environmental Regulations Regulatory Actions Combatting Antisemitism Criminal Justice Policy Federal Workforce Federal Workforce Cuts Cultural Heritage State Policies Government Reform Security Clearance Government Appointments Renaming Initiatives Energy Policy Diversity Policies Tariff Policies Military Diversity Environmental Justice Initiatives Legal Sanctions Climate Change Climate Policy Border Security Political Criticism Federal Grants Foreign Development Assistance State of Emergency Local Executive Orders Public Statements Healthcare Regulations Federal Directives Legal Responses Joe Biden Agency Closures Cybersecurity Policy Legal Actions Impact on States
The court cited likely predetermined transfers that deprived the inmates of meaningful due process.
