Trump Administration Immigration Policy Legal Challenges Federal Funding Pardons Presidential Authority Education Reform Government Efficiency National Security Policy Changes Presidential Powers Donald Trump Biden Administration Legal Profession Federal Authority Legal Implications Military Policy Immigration Reform Free Speech Censorship Law Firms Diversity and Inclusion Federal Government Federal-State Relations Flag Burning Legal Targeting Judicial Review Legal Representation Government Accountability Civil Rights Media Regulation Federal Agencies Government Policy Diversity Initiatives Voting Regulations Law Enforcement Autopen Usage Geographical Renaming Crime Emergency Education Policy Environmental Policy Financial Institutions Federal Intervention State Legislation Trade Policy Declassification National Guard Deployment Alien Enemies Act Government Reorganization Immigration Enforcement Media Relations Legal System Government Restructuring Terminations Antisemitism Funding Cuts Investigations Legal Controversies Healthcare Funding Cultural Institutions Security Clearances Impact on Communities Environmental Regulations Tariffs Combatting Antisemitism Social Media Regulation Criminal Justice Policy Federal Workforce Federal Workforce Cuts Government Reform Security Clearance Regulatory Actions State Policies Government Appointments Renaming Initiatives Diversity Policies Energy Policy Military Diversity Environmental Justice Initiatives Climate Policy Climate Change Federal Directives Federal Grants State of Emergency Border Security Political Criticism Foreign Development Assistance Local Executive Orders Healthcare Regulations TikTok Public Statements Legal Responses Impact on States Legal Actions Voting Procedures Legal Sanctions Joe Biden Agency Closures Cybersecurity Policy Department of Education
Scholars say the strategy tests executive-power limits, pushing key disputes into the courts.