ICE Operations Local Law Enforcement ICE Regulations Civil Rights Legal Consequences Criminal Justice ICE Sensitive Locations Local Ordinances Legal Rights Judicial Oversight Sanctuary Cities Rights of Immigrants Sanctuary Policies School Regulations Legal Challenges Deportation Detainers ICE Cooperation School District Regulations Judicial Warrants Detention Practices State Legislation Local Jurisdictions Federal Agencies Mass-Parole Programs Detention Regulations Court Decisions Biometric Identification Administrative Warrants Due Process DHS Operations Warrantless Arrests Fines Police Procedures Local Compliance Civil Penalties Zero Tolerance Policy State vs Federal Cooperation Body Camera Use Alternatives to Detention Government Agencies ICE Detainers Local vs Federal Authority Crowd Control State vs Federal Authority Child Welfare Federal Immigration Enforcement State Regulations National Security Sanctuary City Laws Controversial Actions Judicial Warrant Federal Agent Incidents Cooperation Restrictions 287(g) Program Deportation Procedures Agency Actions Trump Administration Human Rights Law State Agreements Civil vs Criminal Voluntary Expulsion Community Safety Controversial Tactics Sanctuary States Local Legislation Funding Issues Deportation Law Border Security Use of Force Federal vs. State Law Victims' Rights ICE Detention Human Rights School Policies Family Rights Accountability Verification Processes Legal Actions Deportation Force Constitutional Rights Supreme Court Decisions Trump Administration Policies Sanctions for Illegal Immigrants Legal Aid Public Safety Measures Court Rulings State Enforcement Worksite Raids Sanctuary Laws Consequences for Undocumented Immigrants
The GOP-led committee seeks communications, ICE detainer counts as well as prosecutorial records to build a public-safety case that could escalate federal-local legal battles.
