Federal Courts Constitutional Law Injunctions Immigration Law Administrative Law Appeals High Court Labor Law Appeals Court Temporary Restraining Orders Executive Orders Appeals Process Employment Law Trade Law Political Trials Contempt of Court Sentencing Election Law Legal Challenges High Court Decisions Political Cases Federal Court Civil Rights Environmental Law Criminal Cases Federal Judges Freedom of Speech Deportation Cases Executive Power Supreme Court Decisions Disability Rights Federal Funding Supreme Court First Amendment Due Process Tariffs Political Bans Federal Authority Election Cases Criminal Law Constitutional Court Reservation Policies Tariff Legality Political Implications Constitutionality Compliance Extremism Executive Authority Government Accountability Federal Law Prosecution Trade Regulations Property Law Sanctions Privacy Law Class Action Lawsuits Redistricting Indictments Asylum Law Asylum Seekers Planning Laws Freedom of Information Alien Enemies Act Temporary Injunctions Corporate Law Gender Equality Social Media Regulations Economic Powers Constitutional Issues Film Certification International Law Corruption Cases Grand Jury Public Policy Human Rights Political Corruption International Trade Law Compensation Asylum Cases House Arrest Media Law Jurisdiction Enforcement Executive Actions Education Law Political Influence Deportation Preliminary Injunctions Judicial Independence Prison Reform High Court of Karnataka Legal Precedents Public Safety Electoral Law Legal Conflicts Public Demonstrations Impeachment Process Political Accountability Antitrust Cases Political Meddling
The court ruled prosecutors failed to link the 2002 killing to the narcotics‑retaliation theory central to the federal charges.