Supreme Court Appeals Convictions Sentencing Judicial Decisions Federal Court Prosecution Lawsuits Verdicts Dismissal Criminal Trials Judicial Proceedings Constitutional Law Hush Money Trial Defamation Civil Law Criminal Charges Abortion Laws Trial Proceedings Hush Money Case District Court Evidence Gag Orders Legal Disputes Immunity Legal Proceedings Witness Testimony Appeals Court Gag Order Classified Documents Conviction Criminal Cases Legal Challenges Financial Fraud Criminal Law Immigration Law Judicial Process Supreme Court decisions Victories Domestic Violence Dismissed Cases Special Counsel Appointments Dismissals Dismissal of Trump's Classified Documents Case Records Release Accidents Causing Injury Publicity Stunt High Court Judicial Review Government Litigation Environmental Law Abortion Bans Abortion Federal Judge Nonexistent Cases Ohio Supreme Court Gender Transition Bans Election Result Challenges Post Office Scandal Trial Delays Supreme Court Appeals Petitions Fraudulent Activities Racketeering Human Rights Defamation Lawsuits Fossella v. Adams Fraud Cases Alabama Supreme Court Cases Privacy Laws Challenges to Regulations Dismissal of Lawsuits Immunity Claims Judges FDA Regulations Disqualification Bans Insurrection Legal Fees Data Protection Laws International Court Cases Murthy v. Missouri SCOTUS Rulings SCOTUS Legal Settlements Charges District Attorney Prosecutorial Misconduct New York Supreme Court Rulings State Intervention High-Profile Cases Judgments Fraud Judgment Supreme Court Decisions Falsifying Business Records Legal Documents Supreme Court Case State Laws
The complaint contends that rigid case-number and staffing mandates encroach on state planning powers, risking regional care shortages.