Sentencing Appeals Federal Courts Injunctions Immigration Law Administrative Law Supreme Court Constitutional Law Sentencing Guidelines Prosecution Political Trials Political Cases High Court Defendants Employment Law Civil Rights Criminal Cases Federal Court Criminal Charges Education Law Freedom of Speech Temporary Restraining Orders Murder Trials Election Law Defamation Contempt of Court Deportation Cases Executive Orders Legal Challenges Grand Jury Madras High Court Religious Freedom Causa Vialidad Higher Education Law Customs Law First Amendment Rights Federal Law Criminal Trials Judges Judgments Political Accountability Criminal Justice Media Law Restraining Orders Executive Power Jury Trials Victim Rights Investigations High-Profile Trials Bail Proceedings Youth Offenders Federal Cases Corruption Cases Federal Appeals Court Public Health Law International Trade Law Disability Rights Asylum Seekers Deportation Legal Representation Government Actions Executive Authority Supreme Court Rulings Sexual Assault Election Violations Evidence Tax Law Higher Education Defense Strategies Class Action Lawsuits Appeals Process State vs Federal Government Public Interest Legal Decisions Bail Government Accountability Corruption Trials Judicial Review Fraud Convictions Public Interest Litigation Due Process Tariff Legislation Political Rights Consumer Rights Defense Attorneys National Security Law Foreign Aid Testimonies Pretrial Procedures Indictments Whistleblower Protections Menendez Brothers Privacy Law Government Lawsuits Sanctions State Courts Guilty Pleas Testimony Asylum Appeals
The cases now proceed in Dane County under a rarely used 2011 law, after two liberal justices declined recusal.