Umpiring Decisions Player Conduct Ball Tampering Handshake Controversy Trophy Presentation Umpire Decisions Player Behavior Player Statements Handshake Incident Player Interactions Spirit of Cricket Sandpaper Scandal Selection Issues Player Incidents BCCI Player Decisions Player Relations Trophy Dispute Player Treatment Selection Criteria Match Referee Match Officials Slapgate Incident Match Incidents Asia Cup Player Reactions Sledging Player Selection Ball Change DRS Media Coverage Slapgate Accusations Allegations Substitutions Decision Review System Match-Fixing Regulations Player Allegations Quality Issues ECB Decisions Trophy Controversy India-Pakistan Relations Player Altercations Match Officiating India-Pakistan Rivalry Handshake Dispute DRS Decisions Sportsmanship Favoritism Team Dynamics Match Referees Public Support Fan Reactions Sandpapergate Match Decisions Boycotts Public Opinion Ball-Tampering On-field Altercations Governance Ball Condition Ball Replacement Concussion Substitutes Spot-Fixing Match Cancellations Decision Reviews Public Statements Age Fraud Player Retirements T20 Tournament Age Controversies The Hundred Appeals and Umpiring Decisions Ticket Distribution Player Honesty Slap-gate Incident Chucking Resignations Bowling Action Criticism Points System Discrimination Claims On-field Actions Ball Tampering Allegations Fairness Umpires Babar Azam Spirit of the Game Player Celebrations Trophy Naming Dismissal Controversies Mankad Irfan Pathan Prithvi Shaw Naming Venue Change No-Ball Decisions Public Perception Obstructing the Field
The decision remains in place with questions mounting over how the law was applied.