Defamation Sexual Assault Negligence Damages Personal Injury Sexual Assault Cases Entertainment Law Sexual Harassment Media Law Media Lawsuits Sexual Misconduct Property Disputes Contract Law Assault Claims Fraud Environmental Law Election Law Negligence Claims Settlement Agreements Technology Liability Government Lawsuits Wrongful Death Fraud Cases Sexual Abuse Cases Family Law Celebrity Lawsuits Emotional Distress Financial Disputes Sexual Assault Allegations Political Lawsuits Sexual Assault Claims Sexual Abuse Contract Disputes Malicious Prosecution Defamation Cases Employment Law Harassment Claims Settlements Lottery Disputes Defamation Lawsuits Consumer Protection Government Accountability Maritime Law Assault Cases Defamation Law Assault and Battery Business Disputes Allegations Financial Misconduct Property Law Extortion Police Misconduct Medical Malpractice Immigration Law Sexual Harassment Claims Tort Law Utility Companies Harassment Corporate Law Settlement Aviation Law Emotional Distress Claims Defendants Education Law Sexual Abuse Claims International Lawsuits Trademark Disputes Accountability Municipal Law Abuse Allegations Public Safety Fraud Allegations Consumer Rights Corporate Liability Assault Workplace Harassment High-Profile Cases Identity Issues Utility Liability Business Litigation Corporate Litigation Terrorism Political Litigation Damages Claims Child Abuse Public Interest Litigation Victims' Rights Breach of Contract Abortion Lawsuits Counterclaims Property Damage Business Law Real Estate Law Contractual Disputes Intellectual Property Real Estate Disputes Criminal Charges University Lawsuits Sexual Misconduct Cases Settlement Negotiations
The filing cites a judge’s finding that warrant affidavits included false or misleading claims, seeking over $1 billion.