Juvenile Justice POCSO Act Social Services Legislation Legal Proceedings Child Abuse Legal Framework Physical Punishment Child Welfare Safeguarding Negligence Legal Frameworks Online Safety Education Law Family Law Age of Consent Legal Rights Sexual Offences Neglect Laws Reporting Obligations Safe Haven Laws Regulations Digital Safety Online Regulations Investigation Youth Welfare Digital Law Custody Issues Child Marriage Investigations Internet Safety Legal Charges Corporal Punishment Abuse Cases Social Media Social Media Regulations Mandatory Reporting Legal Representation Safeguarding Policies Legal Violations Online Platforms Online Safety Regulations Abuse Illegal Content Sexual Abuse Prohibition of Child Marriage Act Sexual Offenses Digital Rights Sexual Consent Rights of Minors Legal Aid Immigration Law Working with Children Check Neglect Mental Health Law Babysitting Regulations Safety Regulations Religious Exemptions Marriage Laws Legal Consequences Legal Age Cybercrime Custody Laws Rights of Children Trafficking Working with Children Checks School Regulations Cyber Law Exploitation National Register Corporal Punishment Legislation Physical Assault Artificial Intelligence Background Checks Sexualization Corporate Accountability Regulatory Framework Gender Discrimination Statutes Vetting Procedures Abuse Allegations Missing Children Substance Abuse Legal Reform Jugendarbeitsschutzgesetz Technology Law Migration Law Privacy Rights Digital Communication Legal Incidents Regulatory Compliance Acoso Escolar Amber Alerts Digital Influencers Digital Age Regulations Privacy Laws Minor Offenses Child Protective Services Foster Care Regulations Litigation
The case proceeds as a child-protection inquiry under the Detroit Police Child Abuse Unit.