Public Perception Public Sentiment Legal Rights Deportation Public Safety Legal Status Government Actions Legal Challenges Government Response Border Control Legal Proceedings Illegal Immigration Public Opinion Human Rights Legal Framework Political Responses Refugee Status Public Protests National Security UK Government Criminal Justice Biden Administration Dublin Regulation Political Reactions Public Response Human Rights Violations Border Management Migrants Refugee Rights Germany Border Security Government Contracts Local Governance Refugee Crisis European Union Deportation Laws EU Regulations Deportation Plans Family Separation Syrian Refugees Housing Policy Haitian Immigrants Government Agencies Government Spending Visa Regulations Legal Pathways Afghan Refugees Work Permits Southern Border Protection Rates Living Conditions Detention Centres Humanitarian Parole ICE Detention El Paso Rejected Asylum Applications Rwanda Plan Forced Deportation Sanctuary City Migration Centers Deportation Procedures Regulations France Victims of Crime Undocumented Immigrants Legal Appeals Judicial Process Youth Refugees Human Rights Law Visa Restrictions Afghan Asylum Seekers Iranian Migrants Border Regulations Deferred Action Housing Afghan Migrants Public Debate Detention Return Hubs Refugees European Union Policies Political Proposals Judicial Powers Asylum Policy National Interest Visa Overstay Migrant Assistance Illegal Employment Recognition Rates Asylum Procedures Channel Migrants Work Authorization Government Agreements Labor Rights Statelessness Migrant Deals SNAP Restrictions Enforcement Actions Channel Crossings Mediterranean Migration
Several justices indicated that determining persecution is a fact-driven inquiry, pointing toward a standard that limits appellate courts to deferential review.