Education ❯ Higher Education ❯ University Policies
Faculty Rights Student Activism Faculty Conduct Harvard University Free Speech Government Influence Religious Discrimination Antisemitism First Amendment Rights Diversity and Inclusion Federal Funding International Students Censorship Research Funding Student Rights Political Influence Diversity Initiatives Institutional Responses Cultural Sensitivity Discrimination Research Institutional Autonomy Columbia University Student Protests Disciplinary Actions Curriculum Restrictions Tenure Issues Controversies Gender Studies Faculty Safety Professor Arrests Social Media Policies Bristol University Controversial Faculty Statements Controversial Professors Discrimination Issues Employment Practices Social Media Impact Researcher Rights Course Cancellations Rashid Khalidi Faculty Statements Controversial Statements Civil Rights Gender Identity Education Free Speech Issues Grading Disputes Gender Identity Controversial Speech Boycotts Student Complaints Tenured Faculty Rights Faculty Associations Controversial Views Social Media Controversies Professor Reinstatement Tenure Federal Agreements Faculty Issues Political Climate MIT Historical Reflection Cultural Reflection Diversity of Perspectives Faculty Responses USC Government Proposals Brown University Government Demands Trump Administration Viewpoint Discrimination Viewpoint Neutrality Social Justice Education Controversial Figures Gender Identity Instruction Grading Practices Free Speech on Campus Grading Controversies Instructor Responsibilities Grading Standards Course Content Restrictions Controversial Faculty Actions Protests Labor Violations Race Relations Defamation in Academia Curriculum Controversies Campus Conflicts Campus Climate International Collaboration Institutional Values Protests in Education Antisemitism Awareness Debate on Ideas Political Expression Scholarly Debate Research on Peacebuilding Government Intervention Protests on Campus Political Influence on Education
Internal State Department records warn of free-speech risks, with officials noting weak evidentiary grounds in the cases.
