Transgender Service Members Transgender Issues Personnel Management Conscription Diversity and Inclusion Diversity in the Military Defense Spending Service Members Gender Roles Personnel Issues Personnel Policies Grooming Standards Pentagon Fitness Standards U.S. Military Personnel Regulations Recruitment Arms Control Diversity Initiatives Transgender Troops LGBTQ+ Inclusion Transgender Policy Defense Strategy Domestic Deployment Combat Roles Department of Defense Military Education Use of Force Transgender Individuals in Military Transgender Individuals Discrimination Healthcare in the Military LGBTQ+ Rights Gender Integration Arms Trade Transgender Issues in Military Gender Equality Transgender Military Service Recruitment Issues Leadership Religious Accommodations Transgender Rights Pentagon Policies Arms Race Standards Transgender Inclusion Gender Issues Press Restrictions Combat Readiness Health Conditions Abortion Policy International Military Relations Personnel Policy Geopolitical Strategy Recruitment Standards Transgender Servicemembers Military Promotions Wehrdienst Pentagon Policy Vaccination Policy Irish Military Equal Opportunity Programs Defense Initiatives Transgender Military Ban Short Service Commission Defense Strategies Naval Academy Admissions Processes Civil Rights Naval History Draft Exemptions Facial Hair Regulations Arms Export Control German Armed Forces Retirement Policies Promotion Procedures Tour of Duty Tour Lengths War Department Firearm Regulations Domestic Military Deployment Patches and Badges Military and Society Regulations Separation Boards Dress Code Nuclear Weapons Uniforms Leadership Changes Promotion Processes Threat Reporting Authorization for Use of Military Force Media Relations Pentagon Operations Language Policy Inclusivity Draft Laws Discipline Ideological Shifts Military Leadership
Service branches face a one-year deadline for decisions after compiling lists of roughly 8,700 eligible cases.
