Espionage Cyber Attacks Data Privacy Hacking Election Security Investigations Threats Threat Assessment Cyber Threats Data Protection Cyber Espionage Cyberattacks Social Media Cybercrime Election Integrity Messaging Apps Regulations Email Security Data Breaches Foreign Relations Critical Infrastructure Artificial Intelligence Communication Security Intelligence Operations State-Sponsored Cyberattacks Cyber Operations Cyber Command Connected Vehicles Foreign Investments State-Sponsored Hacking International Relations Telecommunications State-backed Hacking Sabotage Data Breach Regulation Technology Companies Chinese Hacking Incident Response Encryption Ransomware Threat Mitigation Cybersecurity Agencies Software Regulation Technology Policy Cyber Warfare Water Systems Foreign Interference Port Security AI in Security Cyberwarfare Research Programs NATO AI Security Cyber Actors Drones Misinformation Incidents Cyber Intrusions Social Media Risks Hacking Incidents Advisory Committees Data Leakage Data Access AI Technology Technology Risks Energy Security Cyber Exploits Undersea Cables Protection Federal Employees Federal Workforce Hybrid Warfare Threat Detection Human Error Classified Information Encrypted Communication Information Leaks Shadow IT Vulnerabilities Cryptography Chinese Drones Hacking Campaigns Chinese Hackers Chinese Government Hackers Chinese Cyberattacks US Officials Chinese Hacking Campaign Chinese Cyber Threat China-backed Hacking State-sponsored Hacking Infrastructure Malware Attacks Maritime Cyber Threats Maritime Cybersecurity U.S. Coast Guard Chinese Communist Party U.S. Ports Water Sector State Interference Hacking Groups
The court ruled that deploying spyware like Pegasus against hostile elements is lawful, while committing to address individual privacy concerns and keeping sensitive findings classified.