Education Policy Education Funding Higher Education Budgeting Grants Disaster Relief Grants and Loans Education Legal Challenges Social Programs Executive Orders State Compliance Judicial Decisions Impoundment Budget Cuts Sanctuary Cities Infrastructure University Policies Funding Freeze Tax-Exempt Status Legislation Research Funding Transportation Projects Immigration Policy State Cooperation Abortion Industry Health Services Legal Issues Nonprofits Emergency Management Policy Changes Lawsuits Social Services Budget Management Executive Actions Cultural Institutions State Relations Debt Ceiling State Funding Grants and Contracts University Funding Education Programs Presidential Power State Budget Trump Administration Emergency Meetings Public Programs Judicial Rulings Healthcare Funding Law Enforcement Public Schools Office of Management and Budget Budget Authorization Infrastructure Programs Executive Power Financial Aid Fiscal Policy Treasury Department Legal Proceedings Payment Systems Media Organizations Aid Programs Judicial Orders Health and Human Services Agriculture Policy Government Efficiency NIH Funding Cuts Immigration Senate Congressional Authority Health Organizations Transgender Rights Sports Policy Audits USAID State Governance Refugee Resettlement Impact of Immigration Policies Protests Educational Institutions Aid Policies Antidiscrimination Laws Transportation Government Shutdown Congressional Proposals International Aid State Education Funding Broadband Initiatives University Administration Taxpayer Issues Media Funding Election Integrity Measures Education Reform Political Organizations FEMA Shelter and Services Program Antisemitism Environmental Programs Research Grants Tax Policy Tax Exempt Status
The nonprofit prioritized its mission of inclusion over funding tied to Trump’s executive order, leaving a significant budget gap and prompting intensified fundraising efforts.